The Times ran a multipage article, critical of CT angiography, on Sunday, June 29, 2008. The headnote reads: "CT Scans Give Doctors Financial Incentive, But Medical Benefits Are Unproven." Compare this position with the Times supportive position on computerized health records which also (though one wouldn't know it from reading the Times) have unproven medical benefits.
Where's the Times Public Editor when the right side of its brain doesn't talk to the left side?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment